High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"
2491 result(s) found
Found 2491 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Habeas Corpus Petition Examines Legality of Judicial Custody Where Remand Was Not Extended by Competent MCOC Special Court; Accused in Telgi Stamp Scam Seek Release After Non‑Extension of Judicial Remand Under Section 309(2) CrPC by a Judge Not Appointed Under MCOC Act.
14 Oct 2005The petitioners, five accused in the Telgi stamp scam (Special Case No. 2 of 2003 before the MCOC Court at Pune), filed this writ petition under Artic...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging the Process of Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Issue Concerns Whether the Existing System of Designation is Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.
1 Jan 1970Background: The case concerned a writ petition filed by a Senior Advocate challenging the prevailing system of designation of Senior Advocates in the ...
- 41
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Passes Order in Writ Petitions Filed for CBI Investigation into Murder of Former Zilla Panchayat Member. The court heard allegations of flawed police investigation and coercion of witnesses, and reserved orders on 14.02.2019, pronouncing on 01.03.2019 with directions not available in the provided text.
1 Mar 2019The petitioners, who are the mother and brother of the deceased Yogeshgouda Goudar, a former Zilla Panchayat member, filed two writ petitions under Ar...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.
16 Jun 2014The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Constitutional Challenge by Repeat Rape Convicts Against Section 376-E IPC. Sentencing Provision for Life Imprisonment for Repeat Sexual Offenders Alleged to be Arbitrary and Lacking Procedure.
3 Jun 2019Three writ petitions tagged together challenge the constitutional validity of Section 376-E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), inserted by the Crim...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reversal of Reinstatement Order. Industrial Court Erred in Permitting De Novo Enquiry Without Employer Reserving Right in Written Statement as Per Supreme Court Precedent.
8 Aug 2019This writ petition arises from an industrial dispute where the petitioner-employee, a sweeper with the Nanded-Waghala City Municipal Corporation, chal...
- 12
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Initiates Suo-Motu Criminal Contempt Proceedings in ISKCON Property Dispute – Judge's Integrity Questioned via Anonymous Letter. Court Holds that Sending Photographs with Inflammatory Captions Amounts to Blackmail and Scandalizing the Court, Prima Facie Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
16 Apr 2015The High Court of Karnataka initiated suo-motu criminal contempt proceedings against certain individuals associated with ISKCON and advocates, arising...
- 43
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction and Sentence Upheld. Accused's defence of loan repayment and signature denial rejected due to lack of evidence and admission of signature.
28 Mar 2025The petitioner, Narasimhan, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the XXIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistra...
- 39
High Court
High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing Re-Trial Under Section 216(4) Cr.P.C. in Murder Case Transferred to CBI. The Court Holds that Section 216(4) Cr.P.C. Does Not Empower Trial Court to Efface Evidence or Order De Novo Trial; Only Alteration of Charge and Examination of Witnesses for Altered Charge Permitted.
31 Aug 2024The matter arose from a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging an...
- 21
