Search Results for "Central Motor Vehicle Rules"

280 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Lack of Negligence Proof. Claimants Failed to Establish Rash and Negligent Driving by Truck Driver, Resulting in Setting Aside of Tribunal's Award.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 3.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Insurance Appeal and Dismisses Cross Objections in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Contributory Negligence. Deceased's contributory negligence assessed at 40% upheld, but compensation reduced under certain heads.

The case arises from a motor accident on 19th February 2010 on the Pune-Mumbai Express Highway. The deceased, Jignesh Parekh, was driving his car when...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Manufacturers in Sikkim Seeking Exemption from Education Cess and NCCD. Exemption Notification Strictly Construed; Cesses Not Covered as They Were Imposed by Separate Finance Acts After the Notification.

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by M/s. Unicorn Industries and Akshay Ispat and Ferro Alloys Private Limited against the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Injured Claimant and Dismisses Appeal by Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced for Head Injury and Permanent Disability. Claimant awarded Rs. 8,50,000 with interest at 6% per annum from date of petition.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 25.11.2006, when the claimant, P. Bharath, a 20-year-old student, was riding his bicycl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Financier in Motor Vehicle Tax Default Case — Hypothecatee Not Liable for Tax Default Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957. Financier cannot be prosecuted for tax default by registered owner as hypothecation does not confer ownership.

The petitioner, M/s. Shriram Investments Ltd. (now amalgamated with Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.), was a financier for a commercial vehicle bear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Raman & Raman Ltd. in Stage Carriage Permit Matter, Quashing Appellate Authority's Order. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Holds Only Administrative Power; Directions Issued Are Not Law and Cannot Affect Prior Permits.

The appellant, M/s. Raman & Raman Ltd., was one of several applicants for a stage carriage permit. The Regional Transport Authority granted the permit...