COMM ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 543 OF 2025
29 Jul 2026The background of the case involves the acquisition of land admeasuring 1113.2 sq. mtrs. belonging to the predecessor of Respondents 1 and 2 by the Pe...
Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"
456 result(s) found
Found 456 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal: Stranger to Compromise Decree Can Challenge It by Separate Suit — Order 23 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Bar Such Suit
6 May 2020The appeal arose from a suit filed by the appellant, Triloki Nath Singh, seeking a declaration that a compromise decree dated 15 September 1994 passed...
- 1549
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds lower courts' decree for partition and separate possession based on evidence of joint family property and plaintiff's share.
4 Mar 2014The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the defendants (appellants) against the jud...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stay of Execution Proceedings in Possession Suit — Order 21 Rule 29 CPC Not Applicable When Subsequent Suit Relates to Different Property. Decree Holders' Right to Possession Upheld as Judgment Debtor's Application for Stay Was Based on a Suit Involving Different Subject Matter, Constituting Abuse of Process.
18 Jan 2023The petitioners (decree holders) obtained a decree for possession and mesne profits in O.S. No. 3/1971 (later renumbered O.S. No. 79/2003) against the...
- 200
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Cross Appeals Over Interpretation of Trust Deed and Maintainability of Originating Summons. The Court Considers Whether Questions Pertaining to Trust Administration Fall Within the Exclusive Domain of the Charity Commissioner Under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950.
6 Nov 2012This judgment arose from cross appeals against a Single Judge's order dated 5 March 2012 in an Originating Summons filed by Charu K. Mehta, a permanen...
- 12
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Execution Case — Interest Ceases on Withdrawal of Deposited Amount. Court holds that when a decree holder withdraws a deposited amount, interest ceases to run from the date of withdrawal, even if no formal notice under Order XXI Rule 1(4) CPC is given.
8 Dec 2022The case arises from an arbitration award dated 14.04.2000, whereby the appellant, Nepa Limited, was directed to pay Rs. 14,49,300/- to the respondent...
- 143
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.
16 Apr 2024The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order in Execution Proceedings; Permits Power of Attorney Holder to Argue. Execution of Decree for Possession in Specific Performance Suit Involves Third Party Rights.
7 Oct 2005This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXI Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenged the order of a learned...
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Rejection of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings. Execution Court Dismissed Application Under Order XXI Rule 97 Without Enquiry, Allegedly Violating Order XXI Rule 101 CPC.
13 Dec 2024The petitioner, a third party objecting to the execution of a decree for vacant possession, challenged the order of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC...
- 10
