Search Results for "CESTAT order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "CESTAT order"

317 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 317 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Madras Hears Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Duty Demand on Photographic Film Conversion — Tribunal's Order on Revenue Neutrality and Limitation Questioned. Revenue challenges CESTAT's order setting aside duty demand of Rs. 20,37,33,174 under Section 11A(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 on grounds of revenue neutrality and time-bar.

23 Jul 2026

Background: The appeal arose from a central excise duty demand on a company engaged in converting jumbo rolls of photographic films and trading import...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Customs Classification Disputes Over LCD Panels. LCD Panels Classified Under Chapter Heading 9013.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, Not as Parts of Television Sets or Car Audio Systems Under General Headings.

29 Mar 2023

The appeals involved disputes over the customs classification of imported LCD panels by two assessees, M/s Videocon International and M/S Harman Inter...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Cenvat Credit Dispute — Cargo Sales Report Held Valid Document for Availing Credit. CESTAT's finding that Cenvat credit cannot be denied merely because the document does not contain all particulars under Rule 9(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, upheld.

21 Sep 2022

The present appeal was filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai (West) under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order for Provisional Release of Seized iPhones. Ownership Dispute Precludes Release Under Section 110A of Customs Act, 1962.

8 Sep 2022

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, appealed against an order dated 23 June 2022 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Waiving Late Fees for Delayed Bill of Entry Filing. Late Fee Under Section 46(3) of Customs Act, 1962 Is Mandatory and Not Discretionary for Delayed Filing Beyond Prescribed Period.

26 Jul 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Customs, Pune, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the final order of the Customs, Excise...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 35-G of Central Excise Act, 1944. CESTAT Orders Not Appealable to High Court as They Do Not Involve Questions of Law.

23 Nov 2017

The Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs filed two appeals under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against orders of the Customs, Excis...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar and Exemption Eligibility Upheld. CESTAT's finding of bona fide belief based on Commissionerate clarification and acceptance of CSIO/ADA certificate for exemption under Notification No.10/97-CE sustained.

8 Feb 2017

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bengaluru-V Commissionerate, against the order dated 08.01.2015 passed by the Customs, Exc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Detention Notice in Customs Act Matter — Pre-deposit Adjustment Sought. Court holds that amounts deposited during investigation and audit can be adjusted towards mandatory pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 for maintaining appeal.

9 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s Bhatia Global Trading Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution before the High Court of Karnatak...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Special Counsel in Customs and Excise Matters. Rule 9 of Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 and Rule 12 of Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 held not ultra vires.

19 Jan 2015

The petitioner, an advocate enrolled in the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a Public Interest Litigation in 2014 challenging an endorsement dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Valuation Case — Issue Already Adjudicated by CESTAT. Principle of Res Judicata Applied to Successive Show Cause Notices for Enhancing Invoice Value Under Customs Act, 1962.

5 Oct 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Royal Oil Field Private Limited, entered into a contract on February 25, 2002 with M/s. IMX Port National Trading Corporation, Ca...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)