Search Results for "Article 300-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Article 300-A"

323 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 323 result(s)

High Court

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

27 Mar 2026

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Development Case Due to Delay and Acquiescence. Petitioner Barred from Challenging Notification After Voluntarily Executing Relinquishment Deed Accepting Conditions, Constituting Estoppel and Laches Under Constitutional and Administrative Law Principles.

3 Mar 2026

The State of Karnataka filed an intra-court writ appeal challenging an order dated 28.09.2022 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.19058/2022. T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Failure to Pay Compensation Violates Article 300A. Petitioners' land acquired for Upper Krishna Project; compensation not paid despite notice under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

23 Sep 2025

The petitioners, owners of Plot No.1 in RS. No.18/B situated at Bagalkot, Ward No.11, Gaddankeri, Bagalkot taluk, filed a writ petition under Articles...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Land Acquisition Reference Matter — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Application Under Section 18(3)(b) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court held that the Land Acquisition Officer must forward the reference application to the civil court if the applicant is entitled to seek reference under Section 18(1) of the Act.

19 Sep 2025

The petitioners, Sri Shrikant S/o Bhavu Desai and Smt. Hira W/o Bhavu Desai, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Pr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Town Municipality in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reference Held Within Limitation. Court upholds reference filed under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as within time, rejecting appellant's limitation plea based on lack of evidence of valid award notice.

18 Apr 2024

The Town Municipal Council, Holenarasipur, the beneficiary of land acquisition, appealed against the judgment and award dated 30.01.2020 passed by the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Reference Court's Valuation of Agricultural Land at Rs.1,68,092/- Per Acre Upheld. Land Acquisition Officer's Award Based on Comparable Sale Deed Found Just and Proper Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

4 Oct 2023

The appellant, Gulappa Basappa Chithapur, lost 4 acres and 2 guntas of agricultural land in Sy. No.8/1 in Karadi Village, Taluk Hunagund, due to acqui...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Commutation of Pension During Pendency of Criminal Proceedings. Rule 4 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1984 Bars Commutation of Provisional Pension When Proceedings Are Pending.

7 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Parasram s/o Gomaji Nasre, a retired employee of Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur, filed a writ petition seeking commutation of his pension....

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions by Cable TV Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option and Imposition of Tax on Monthly Subscriptions. Amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D of Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act, 1958, Held Valid and Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A of Constitution.

1 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s Hathway Krishna Cable (P) Limited and Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Limited, are Multi System Operators (MSOs) providing cable tel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Cable Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option Under Entertainment Tax Laws. The court upheld the amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D as valid and non-discriminatory, rejecting claims of violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A.

1 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s Hathway Krishna Cable (P) Limited and Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Limited, are Multi System Operators (MSOs) providing cable tel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)