Search Results for "Armed Forces Tribunal"

174 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 174 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Artificer III Seeking Equal Grade Pay with Chief Petty Officer in Indian Navy — Grade Pay Anomaly Not Established as Artificer III is a Lower Rank than Chief Artificer.

The appellant, Manish Kumar Rai, was an Artificer III in the Indian Navy. He challenged the grade pay of Rs.3400 granted to Artificers of Class I, II ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Personnel Dismissed for Overstaying Leave on Compassionate Grounds. Held that absence due to wife's illness with medical certificates constituted sufficient cause under Section 39(b) of the Army Act, 1950.

The appellant, Ex Sepoy Madan Prasad, was enrolled in the Army Service Corps on 4th January 1983 as a Mechanical Transport Driver. In 1998, he was gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of BIS Employee in Sexual Harassment Case Due to Lack of Sanction for Prosecution. Sanction for prosecution under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory for public servants acting in official capacity; refusal of sanction by competent authority renders criminal proceedings invalid.

The present criminal appeal arises from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, which dismissed the appellant's petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Disability Pension Arrears for Ex-Serviceman from 1995 to 2014. Denial of disability pension to a former soldier for the period between 1995 and 2014 was held misconceived as the disability was later assessed at 20% permanently, entitling him to arrears.

The appellant, Madan Prasad Sinha @ Sanatan Baba, was enrolled in the Indian Army's Corps of Signals as a Radio Mechanic on 18 February 1971. He was d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 9(1) of Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1977 Providing Reservation for Ex-Servicemen and Physically Handicapped. Rule 9(1) Held Valid and Not Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Pankaj Premanand Nagekar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Army Major's Resignation in Writ Petition Under Article 226 — Rejection Set Aside as Arbitrary. Right to Resign Must Be Considered Reasonably with Disclosure of Valid Reasons.

The petitioners, Major Yogesh Chandra Madhav Sayanakar and Ms. Shruti Kulkarni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...