Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee"

153 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 153 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes License Cancellation Orders in APMC Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' licenses cancelled without show cause notice or hearing, set aside for non-compliance with Section 127 of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966.

The petitioners, three firms engaged in flower, fruit, and vegetable trading in Tumakuru, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recount Order in APMC Election. Commissioner's order for rescrutiny and recount of all ballot papers set aside as there was no material irregularity in counting.

The petitioner, Milind Shreeram Tayade, was elected as a member of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), Amravati, from a seat reserved...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging APMC Market Fee Exemption for Farmers. Exemption notification under Section 63 of Karnataka APMC Act, 1966 held valid and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, who are traders and commission agents in the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) yard at Tiptur, filed a Public Interest Lit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Against Recovery Order. Recovery of Excess Payment Without Imposing Penalty Not Appealable Under Rule 104 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1967.

The petitioner, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Hinganghat, challenged an order dated 10-12-2008 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Market Committee Member Against Disqualification for Resigning as Gram Panchayat Member. Resignation from Gram Panchayat Does Not Disqualify Under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Purshottam Tonpe, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Mahakal. Subsequently, he contested and won election to the Agriculture P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Board's Petition, Holds Agricultural Marketing Board is an 'Industry' Under Industrial Disputes Act. Labour Court's jurisdiction upheld as Board engages in systematic activities with employer-employee relationship.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the Maharashtra Agricultural Marketing Board challenging the orders of the Labour Court which held t...