Search Results for "union rivalry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "union rivalry"

115 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union Petition as Infructuous Due to Merger of Petitioner Union. Petition challenging recognition of another union under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 becomes infructuous as petitioner union ceased to exist and no interim relief was granted.

26 Sep 2025

The petitioner, All India Siemens Employees Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, filed a writ petition in 2006 challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Rejection of Workman's Complaint Seeking Cancellation of Recognition of Union. Individual Employee Cannot Initiate Proceedings Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act.

3 May 2018

The dispute arose out of a complaint filed by an individual workman, Bharat Jijaba Shinde, purportedly on behalf of 309 out of 400 employees of Force ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Recognition Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act — Employer Has Locus to Seek Cancellation of Union Recognition. The Court held that Section 13 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 does not restrict the right to apply for cancellation of recognition to any particular category, and the employer, being a necessary party, can maintain such an application.

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Association of Engineering Workers, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, was granted recognition by the Industri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition and Dismisses Union's Petition in Industrial Dispute Over Recognition of Union. Industrial Court's interim order directing recognition of union as sole bargaining agent set aside as beyond jurisdiction under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

19 Dec 2025

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging an interim order passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai, under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Dismissal of Workmen; Finds Dismissal Valid and No Violation of Natural Justice. The Court upheld concurrent findings of the Labour Court and Industrial Court that no unfair labour practice under Item 1(a) of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act was committed, as dismissal was justified by grave misconduct.

19 Jul 2018

The dispute arose when Peico Electronic & Electrical Co. Ltd., a company manufacturing radios, electronics, and tape recorders, dismissed five of its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Bank Policy Barring Retired Union Office Bearers from Grievance Redressal Meetings — Violation of Trade Union Rights Under Trade Unions Act, 1926. The court held that a policy prohibiting retired elected office bearers from participating in grievance redressal committee meetings is arbitrary and infringes upon the right of union members to elect their representatives under the Trade Unions Act, 1926.

2 Aug 2024

The petitioner, All India Bank of Maharashtra Employees Federation, a recognized trade union, challenged Clause 6(d) of the Employees Grievances Redre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Trade Union Recognition and Election in Air India. Court upholds the validity of the recognition granted to Air India Employees Union and the election conducted under the Code of Discipline in Industry, 1958.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Air India Employees Guild and Air Corporation Employees Union challenging the recognition granted...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union Secretary's Challenge to Dismissal in BEST Undertaking Case — Delay in Charge Sheet Not Fatal as Permission Obtained from Labour Court. The court upheld the dismissal of a protected employee under Section 101 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, despite the charge sheet being issued beyond six months, as the employer had obtained due permission from the Labour Court.

10 Mar 2006

The petitioner, the General Secretary of the BEST Workers Union, was a protected employee under Section 101 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 19...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Cooperative Federation on Pay Scale Revision Date Due to Financial Constraints. The Court Held That Financial Stringency Is a Valid Consideration for Deferring Implementation of Revised Pay Scales Under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Service Rules, Overturning the High Court's Finding of Unfairness.

9 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the Punjab State Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd. against a High Court order that a...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears writ petition challenging School Tribunal's reinstatement of teacher in termination dispute under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The Court considered whether the inquiry committee properly followed Rules 36 and 37 of MEPS Rules, 1981, and whether legal evidence supported the charges.

29 Aug 2006

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition filed by the management and headmaster of Janta High School, Shirol, challenging the Scho...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)