Search Results for "time-barred appeal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "time-barred appeal"

37 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court's Review Order in Mutation Dispute — Review Power Cannot Be Used to Rehear Merits After Dismissal of SLP. The High Court's review order was set aside as it sought to re-examine the merits after the Supreme Court had dismissed the SLP against the original judgment, and the contempt petition was barred by limitation.

1 Jan 2024

The present appeals arise from a long-standing property dispute concerning land known as 'Asman Jahi Paigah' in Raidurg village. The original suit for...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Due to Court Closure During Limitation Period — Condonation of Delay Granted. The period of court closure during winter vacation is excluded for computing limitation under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Feb 2022

The appellant, aggrieved by an arbitral award dated 24.08.2016, sought to challenge it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution of Foreign Decree Case, Holding Limitation Period of 12 Years Runs from Date of Foreign Decree. Bank of Baroda's Execution Petition Filed 14 Years After London Decree Held Time-Barred Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

1 Jan 2020

The case involves a dispute between Bank of Baroda (appellant) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (respondent, successor of Vysya Bank) regarding the limita...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

18 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Electricity Board Against MSEFC Awards Due to Limitation — Limitation Period Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to MSMED Act Awards. Delay of 120 days cannot be condoned as per Section 34(3) proviso, and no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the applications to set aside the awards.

27 Aug 2018

The case involves nine commercial appeals filed by various micro and small enterprises (appellants) against the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Debt Recovery Pre-deposit Dispute — Holds Pre-deposit Not Required at Condonation of Delay Stage. The court ruled that Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 does not mandate pre-deposit before considering an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 20 of the Act.

18 Mar 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Deluxe Cotton Corporation and others, challenged an order dated 14 July 2014 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Debt Recovery Pre-deposit Dispute — Holds Section 21 Not Applicable at Condonation Stage. The court ruled that the pre-deposit requirement under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 applies only at the stage of entertainment of appeal, not at the stage of considering an application for condonation of delay.

18 Mar 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Deluxe Cotton Corporation and others, challenged an order dated 14 July 2014 of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Refusal to Condone Delay in Appeal Against Termination. Petitioner's Multiple Forums and Unexplained Delay of Over Three Years Justified Rejection of Condonation Application.

1 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Popat Sitaram Godge, was terminated from service on 22.05.1994 by the respondent educational institution. Instead of filing an appeal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Education Service Dispute — Illegal Termination Violates M.E.P.S. Rules. Employee's discontinuation without inquiry and notice held illegal; employer directed to reinstate with back wages and continuity.

19 Mar 2012

The case involves an appeal by an educational institution and its headmaster against a common judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Trial Court Erred in Ignoring Statutory Presumption Under Section 139. The Court held that once the cheque and its dishonour are proved, the presumption of legally enforceable debt arises, and the accused must rebut it with probable evidence.

12 Jan 2010

The appellant, Adarsh Gramin Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, agai...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)