Search Results for "sugar cane control order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "sugar cane control order"

68 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Denial of NOC for Sugar Mill — No Legal Right to NOC Under Sugarcane Control Order. The court held that the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 does not confer a right to obtain a No Objection Certificate for setting up a sugar mill, and the Commissioner's refusal based on existing capacity was valid.

31 Mar 2023

The appellants, M/s Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s Shri Bharmanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ appeal against the order of a learn...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Binding Precedent. Order of Commissioner for Cane Development set aside for being contrary to earlier court direction and lacking reasons.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioners, M/S. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/S. Shri. Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Sugar Cane Reservation Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Government Notification. Court holds that notification under Section 21 of the Karnataka Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961 must be based on actual production capacity and not on installed capacity.

21 Nov 2025

The case involves a dispute over the reservation of cane supply area under the Karnataka Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961. The...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Previous Court Direction. Order passed without considering objections and contrary to earlier writ court direction to hear petitioners before granting licence to third party.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioners, M/s. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s. Shri Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Aerial Distance Certificate for New Sugar Factory — Notification Increasing Distance Not Retrospective. The court held that the Commissioner of Sugar was not required to consider factors beyond aerial distance under Clause 6-B of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

5 Dec 2014

The petitioner, a sugar factory registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the order dated 2 July 2011 of the Commissioner of Sugar, Maharas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Sugar Mills' Appeals Against Sugarcane Price Fixation Order — State's Power to Fix Minimum Price Upheld. The Court held that the Sugarcane Control Board's order fixing the minimum price of sugarcane at Rs. 2,500 per tonne was valid and not arbitrary, as it was based on recommendations of the Cane Commissioner and aimed at protecting farmers' interests.

12 Feb 2015

The case involves appeals by four sugar mills against an order of the Sugarcane Control Board fixing the minimum price of sugarcane at Rs. 2,500 per t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sugar Mills' Challenge to Cess Notification on Sugarcane. State Notification Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce (Development and Regulation) Act, 1965 Held Ultra Vires Due to Repugnancy with Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

30 Apr 2020

The petitioners, seven sugar mills in Maharashtra, challenged a Government notification dated 22.3.2018 issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Agri...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to State Notification Fixing Sugarcane Price Despite Central FRP Under Essential Commodities Act. Section 6 of the EC Act Grants Overriding Effect to Central Orders Over Inconsistent State Enactments.

6 Nov 2014

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the state government's notification fixing sugarcane price and the c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Sugar Mill Licensing Case — Aerial Distance Certificate Requirement Not Applicable to Defunct Factory. Clause 6A of Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Requires Existing and Operating Sugar Factory for Distance Calculation.

11 Aug 2016

The appellant, Bhavna Agro Products and Services Private Limited, sought to establish a sugar mill and applied for an Aerial Distance Certificate unde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Sugar Mills' Appeals Against Sugarcane Price Fixation Orders — State Government's Power to Fix Minimum Price Under Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Upheld. The court held that price fixation is a quasi-legislative function and no hearing is required before fixing the minimum price of sugarcane.

12 Feb 2015

The case involves four writ appeals filed by sugar mills (M/s. Sri Chamundeshwari Sugars Ltd., M/s. Shamanur Sugars Limited, The India Sugars & Refine...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)