Search Results for "side pocket"

336 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 336 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in CBI Trap Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Accused Public Servant's Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Restored as Trial Court's Acquittal Based on Minor Contradictions Was Perverse.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Shriram Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant in Corruption Case for Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Appellant convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting Rs. 500 as illegal gratification for processing a grant application.

The appellant, Manoj Shankar Deshpande, a public servant working as an Assistant in the Fisheries Department, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Balwant Malvankar, was a clerk/beat inspector with the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation. He was convicted by the Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Clerk for Bribery in Pension Case, Acquits Head Clerk Due to Lack of Demand Proof. Accused No.2 convicted under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting Rs.2000 bribe for processing pension proposal.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Special Judge (Anti-Corruption), Pune, in Special Case No.53 of 2015. The State of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Pandurang Waghere, was a Talathi working in the revenue department. The complainant, Suhas Jagtap, held a Power of Attorney for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Demand for Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Kolhapur, acquitting the respondent Sikandar Khutubuddin Mujawar of charg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Purushottam Raghunath Kulkarni, was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Pandit Shankar Chaudhari and Subhash Kitk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Doubtful Trap — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 not proved; complainant turned hostile; trap witness not independent.

The appellant, Manohar Bodade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case No. 01/1993 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r...