Search Results for "seeds expiry"

35 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Seeds Act Proceedings for Lack of Sanction — Seeds Inspector Not Authorized to File Complaint Without Prior Sanction Under Section 21 of Seeds Act, 1966

The petitioner, Mohan H. Handral, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking to quash the proceeding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Seeds Act Proceedings for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 14(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 Renders Complaint Invalid.

The petitioner, Mohan H. Handral, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking to quash the proceeding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 14(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The applicants, Ajeet Seeds Ltd., M/s Bhushan Agro Agencies, and M/s Bharatkumar Purushottam Potdar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Seed Company Officials in Seeds Act Violation Case. Court holds that vicarious liability cannot be imposed on officers without specific averments of their role in the alleged offence under Section 6(b) read with Section 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966.

The petitioners, M/s Mahyco Vegetable Seeds Ltd. (a seed producer), its Deputy Manager (Legal) M.M. Chavan, and Senior Manager (SDM) Anil Kolte, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Loss of Right to Re-test Sample. Applicant's Right Under Section 16(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 to Send Sample to Central Seed Testing Laboratory Lost as Shelf Life of Seed Expired Before Complaint Filed.

The applicant, Regional Manager of Prabhat Agri Bio-Tech Ltd., challenged criminal proceedings in S.C.C. No. 313 of 2003 pending before the Chief Judi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Monsanto's Petition on Seed Supply as Sale, Allows Subway's Petition on Franchise as Service. Court Holds That Impregnated Seed Supply is Sale of Goods Under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, While Franchise Agreement is Not a Deemed Sale of Intellectual Property Rights.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated two writ petitions tagged together, raising the common issue of whether certain transactions were liable to service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...