Search Results for "section 70(1)"

377 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 377 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010028192013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging VAT Investigation Post-GST. Section 78 of Maharashtra GST Savings Act Held Valid as It Continues VAT Act Only for One Year from Appointed Day as Permitted by Constitution Amendment.

The petitioner, Magma Fincorp Limited, a non-banking finance company registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (VAT Act), challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Club Membership Fees as Revenue Expenditure. Payment of entrance and subscription fees to Willington Sports Club held to be revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure, as it was for short-term membership renewal and did not create an enduring benefit.

The petitioner, Swiss Re Services India Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 29 March 2010 issued under Section 148 of the Income...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in GST Case for Non-Compliance with Section 83(1) MGST Act — Attachment Without Pending Proceeding or Prior Notice Invalid

The petitioner, Praful Nanji Satra, a businessman who rented out commercial premises and paid GST on license fees, challenged a provisional attachment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order Classifying Motor-home Under CTH 87.02. Settlement Commission Has Jurisdiction to Interpret Tariff Classification Under Customs Act, 1962.

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28.07.2008 passed by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission, Additio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing MPID Act Attachment Against Corporate Debtor's Property. Section 32A IBC Overrides MPID Act as Property Acquired Prior to Offence and Corporate Debtor Not Accused.

The petitioner, Dwarka Iron Industries Pvt. Ltd., as the Successful Resolution Applicant of the corporate debtor M/s. Abhirama Steels Limited, filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

...