Search Results for "section 64-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "section 64-A"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Tribunal's Grant of Permits in Motor Vehicles Act Dispute Over Appealability of RTA's Rejection of New Route Applications. Decision on Necessity of New Route Under Section 47(3) Not Appealable Under Section 64(a) as It is a General Order Not Relating to Individual Applications.

8 Sep 1969

The dispute arose under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, concerning the appealability of an order passed by the Regional Transport Authority (RTA) reject...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Raman & Raman Ltd. in Stage Carriage Permit Matter, Quashing Appellate Authority's Order. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Holds Only Administrative Power; Directions Issued Are Not Law and Cannot Affect Prior Permits.

18 Feb 1959

The appellant, M/s. Raman & Raman Ltd., was one of several applicants for a stage carriage permit. The Regional Transport Authority granted the permit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicles Act Permit Case Due to Inherent Power of Regional Transport Authority to Substitute Successor. Widow of Deceased Applicant Permitted to Prosecute Pending Application for Stage Carriage Permit, Holding That the Act Does Not Bar Consideration of Changed Circumstances.

18 Oct 1968

The dispute pertained to the grant of a permanent stage carriage permit under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The appellant’s husband had applied for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 36 Renders Complaint Invalid. Court held that prior sanction of the Commissioner is mandatory for prosecution under Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) r/w 36 of the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, and its absence vitiates the criminal proceedings.

6 May 2013

The petitioners, seven residents of Jolly Maker I Cooperative Housing Society in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging the Constitutionality of Maharashtra Act IX of 2017. Petitioners Contend that Multi-Member Wards and Direct Election of President Violate Article 243R and Equality Clauses.

28 Sep 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Awards in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Court Holds That Construction of Contractual Clause by Arbitrator Falls Within Arbitral Domain and Is Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jun 2019

The case involves five appeals filed by Central Warehousing Corporation (the appellant) against a common judgment dated 18.02.2019 dismissing its arbi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Deletes Directions for Payment of Processing Costs in Section 11 Arbitration Applications. Direction for Payment of Costs for Processing Requests Under Schemes Framed Under Section 11(10) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Unsustainable Due to Absence of Statutory Basis and the Judicial Nature of the Order.

5 Jul 2013

The High Court of Bombay was seized of three applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Abhijeet Infrastruc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner Company Failed to Show Perversity or Jurisdictional Error in Awards Granting Relief to Workmen.

23 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Electropneumatics And Hydraulics India Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging separate ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NDPS Proceedings Against Petitioner for Lack of Evidence of Conscious Possession and Commercial Quantity. Court holds that mere presence in a vehicle with contraband does not constitute possession under Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of NDPS Act without proof of knowledge and control.

27 May 2024

The petitioner, Mr. Kalam Narendra, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Three-Judge Bench the Question Whether Quantity of Mixture or Pure Drug Content Determines Punishment Under NDPS Act. The Court Held That E. Micheal Raj Requires Reconsideration as It Omitted Note 2 of Notification and the Scheme of the Act Treating Preparations as a Whole.

22 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court, in a reference arising from multiple appeals and writ petitions, considered the correctness of the decision in E. Micheal Raj v. In...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)