Search Results for "retrospective demand"

267 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 267 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wilful Suppression.

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in floriculture, and the Commis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tool Checkers' Merger with Retrospective Effect in Service Law Dispute. Central Administrative Tribunal's direction for prospective merger of cadres set aside, holding that merger must be effective from 25th June 1985.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by employees of the Union of India, primarily Tool Checkers, challenging the order of the Central Admi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Service Tax Amendment on Renting of Immovable Property. The Court upheld the explanation to Section 65(105)(zzc) of the Finance Act, 1994 as clarificatory and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Chanakya Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Prospective Application of Section 234D. Interest Under Section 234D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Cannot Be Charged for Assessment Year 2002-03 as the Provision Applies Only From Assessment Year 2004-05.

The appeal by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged an order dated 24/11/2010 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Charges in Distillery License — Levy Upheld as Contractual Obligation Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The petitioners, Sahakar Maharshi Bhausaheb Thorat Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice dated ...