Search Results for "reference under Section 85-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "reference under Section 85-A"

21 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tenancy Determination and Compromise Decree Execution — Tenancy Rights Not Established Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The Court upheld the MRT's finding that the petitioners were not tenants and that the compromise decree was void ab initio.

11 Sep 2024

The case involves a long-standing dispute over agricultural land Survey No.99/2 in Sangli. The land was originally leased to Dadoba Yedekar in 1942. I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

6 Feb 2024

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between family members. The appellants in SA-284-2019 were the original defendant...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit Challenging Tenancy Proceedings, Remands for Trial on Limitation and Jurisdiction. Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Set Aside as Limitation and Civil Court Bar Under Section 85 of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Are Triable Issues Requiring Evidence.

17 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed in 1987 by 13 plaintiffs claiming to be legal representatives of Haji Ali Mohammed Hajee Kassam Agboatw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court's Refusal to Refer Tenancy Issue to Competent Authority. Jurisdictional Question of Tenancy Must Be Decided by Tenancy Court Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

11 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Saiyyed Wase Ahmed, challenged the order of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nawapur, dated 12th January 2018, which refused to refe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Joint Family Property Dispute — Tenancy Rights Determined Under Bombay Tenancy Act, Civil Court Jurisdiction Barred. The court held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to decide tenancy issues under Sections 85 and 85A of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, but the certificate under Section 32M had become final.

27 Aug 2019

The dispute pertains to an open land measuring eight acres in Nasik, originally owned by Raghunath Hari Phadake. The land was taken on lease by Govind...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Secondary Evidence in Specific Performance Suit. Conditions under Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 for leading secondary evidence were not satisfied as plaintiffs failed to prove loss of original document and did not issue notice to produce.

14 Sep 2010

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No. 120/2006, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 21.12.197...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widows' Petition for Succession Certificate Under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Held That Widows and Minor Children of Deceased Coparceners Are Entitled to Equal Share in Joint Family Property Despite Objections by Male Coparceners.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, being the widows and minor children of deceased coparceners (Abhay Vithal Mandle, Raosaheb Vithal Mandle, and Baban Vithal Mandle), f...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)