Search Results for "recognised trade union"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "recognised trade union"

537 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 537 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act — Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld. The court held that the Industrial Court correctly declared the first respondent-union as the recognized union, as it had higher membership and the verification was properly conducted.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Provide Facilities to Recognised Union Under MRTU and PULP Act. Recognised Union Entitled to Same Facilities as Unrecognised Union Under Section 20 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

31 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Tata Memorial Centre, challenged an order dated 31.8.2005 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No. 919 of 2001. The respo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court’s Recognition of Trade Union Under MRTU & PULP Act. Recognition Granted Based on Retrospective Membership Payments Raises Question of Legal Validity.

3 May 2006

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 3 March 1998 of the Industrial Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

6 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Recognition Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act — Employer Has Locus to Seek Cancellation of Union Recognition. The Court held that Section 13 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 does not restrict the right to apply for cancellation of recognition to any particular category, and the employer, being a necessary party, can maintain such an application.

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Association of Engineering Workers, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, was granted recognition by the Industri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case, Holding Unrecognised Union Cannot Maintain Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court ruled that only a recognised union has locus standi to file a complaint under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 for items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV.

18 Dec 2015

The case involves an appeal by Ballarpur Industries Limited (appellant) against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Employee Seeking Impleadment in Union Recognition Proceedings — Employee's Resignation from Union Does Not Confer Locus Standi to Intervene in Recognition Application Under MRTU & PULP Act.

26 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Shri Gireesh U.G. Menon, was an employee of M/s. Crawford Bayley & Co. and a former member of the Mumbai Mazdoor Sabha (Respondent No....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Five Workmen as Protected Workmen — Trade Union Must Be Registered Under Trade Unions Act, 1926 to Claim Protection Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that an unregistered trade union cannot seek declaration of its office bearers as protected workmen under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Nov 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Wonderla Holidays Limited, a public limited company running amusement parks, challenged an order dated 16.09.2017 passed by the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order for Non-Speaking Nature and Non-Compliance with Form-C in Trade Union Recognition Dispute. The Court held that a quasi-judicial authority must provide reasons for its decision and that strict compliance with procedural requirements under Section 14 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 is mandatory.

11 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Shramik Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order dated 23-8-2006 passed by the Industrial ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)