Search Results for "proximate time"

777 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 777 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of Over One Month Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Rani, mother of the detenu Sidharaj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 42 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Tmt. Valarmathi, mother of the detenu Thiru Jayaprakash, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 35 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Srinivasan, father of the detenu Indhu @ Indumathi, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order held to snap live link, rendering detention invalid under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Pavithra R, the elder sister of the detenu Ajith Kumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Proximity. FIR lodged 21 days after suicide held not proximate and liable to be quashed under Section 528 BNSS.

The petitioner, Poonam Brijmohansingh Bhadoriya, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Preventive Detention Order Under Sexual Offender Act Set Aside as Live Link Snapped.

The petitioner, Kumaresan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained delay of 37 days snaps the 'live and proximate link' between grounds of detention and purpose of detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Sarojini, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 29.07.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention. Delay of 38 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Matheshwari, mother of the detenu Jeganraj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the M...