Search Results for "prospective service"

1042 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1042 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Prospective Overruling in Bonus Marks Case for Teacher Appointments in Rajasthan. The Court held that only writ petitioners who moved the High Court before November 18, 1999, are entitled to relief, and appointments made before that date are saved.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from conflicting decisions of the Rajasthan High Court regarding the interpretation of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Promotee Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Direct Recruits in Income Tax Department — Direct Recruits Not Entitled to Seniority from Vacancy Year When Recruitment Process Not Initiated in That Year.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by promotees (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had quashed the seniority li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pension Benefits Case Under Regularisation Rules. Employee Not Entitled to Old Pension Scheme as Initial Appointment Was on Contract Basis and Regularisation Was Prospective Under Rule 6 of Regularisation Rules, 2011.

The dispute centered on the entitlement of an employee to pensionary benefits under the old pension scheme following the regularisation of his service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Whether Retrospective Absorption Order Requires Review of Earlier Promotional Exercises for Superintendents (Legal/Drafting). Legal Principle Examined: Whether Regular Service for Promotion Can Be Counted Retrospectively When Government Recognises Prior Cadre Status.

The writ petition was filed by two Legal Assistants working in the Law Department of the Government of Goa, who sought a review of the departmental pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tool Checkers' Merger with Retrospective Effect in Service Law Dispute. Central Administrative Tribunal's direction for prospective merger of cadres set aside, holding that merger must be effective from 25th June 1985.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by employees of the Union of India, primarily Tool Checkers, challenging the order of the Central Admi...