Search Results for "phenolphthalein powder"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal was filed by Gangamma, a Supervisor in the Women and Child Welfare Department, challenging her conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Acquits Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and independent witnesses turned hostile.

The case involves two appeals by accused police officers (Ramaiah, Police Head Constable, and T.R. Hanumanthaiah, Police Sub-Inspector) against their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act for Alleged Bribery. Accused Program Executive Convicted Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) for Demanding and Accepting Bribe of Rs.20,000.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from the conviction of the appellant, a former Program Executive at Doordarshan Kendra, Bangalore,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Wamanrao Pawar, a Head Constable, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Special Case No. 3 of 1989 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Narendra Pralhadrao Mahajan, a Junior Clerk in the Court of 3rd Joint Judicial Magistrate, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved. Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration Led to Benefit of Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 10/08/2000 passed by the learned Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 31 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...