Search Results for "parallel imports"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Legality of Entry Tax on Goods Imported from Abroad; State Legislations of Orissa, Bihar, Kerala and Jharkhand Under Scrutiny

Background: The case involves a batch of civil appeals before the Supreme Court concerning the levy of entry tax on goods imported from foreign countr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Bearings in IPR Suspension Case — Mandamus Issued for Violation of IPR Rules 2007. Customs Authorities Suspended Clearance Without Confiscation Order or Notice Under Rule 7 of IPR Rules, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, NBU Bearings Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Import of Peas Under Restricted Category Based on Pre-Notification Contracts. Petitioners' goods cleared as contracts entered prior to amendment notification dated 29.03.2019 under Section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

The petitioners, M/s. Harihar Collections and M/s. Raj Grow Impex LLP, are engaged in the import and export of agricultural commodities. They imported...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Internal Enquiry Report Not Shared With Contractor Before Imposing Business Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by respondent No.2, Oil and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Enquiry Officer's Report Not Furnished to Contractor Before Imposing Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by Respondent No.2, Oil and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Kerosene Dealers' Association Challenging Inclusion of VAT in Ceiling Price. State's Power to Fix Maximum Price Including Taxes Upheld Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The petitioners, Mumbai Kerosene Dealers' Association and its members, who are wholesale kerosene dealers holding licences under the Maharashtra Keros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition by Deutsche Bank Against Finolex Industries Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Derivative Transaction Debt Precludes Summary Winding-Up. Court Holds That Winding-Up Petition Is Not a Debt Recovery Mechanism and Dismisses Petition with Costs.

The judgment arises from a Company Petition filed by Deutsche Bank AG, Mumbai Branch, seeking winding-up of Finolex Industries Limited under Section 4...