Search Results for "owner impleadment"

341 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 341 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Appeal in Motor Accident Case Involving Personal Accident Cover for Borrower of Vehicle. Maintainability of Claim Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Examined.

The case arose from a motor vehicle accident in which Mr. B. Uma Shankar, while riding a borrowed two-wheeler, fell and sustained fatal injuries after...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Impleadment and Amendment in Mortgage Redemption Suit to Avoid Multiplicity of Litigation. Person in Actual Possession Held Necessary Party Under Order I Rule 10 CPC Despite Belated Application.

The appellant, Kamlesh Gupta, mortgaged a shop to Mangat Rai (first respondent) for Rs. 7 lakhs in 2009. She later filed a suit for possession by rede...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Impleadment Order in Civil Suit Under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Applicants Claiming Independent Title and Possession Over Suit Property Are Necessary Parties for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioner, Gajanan Mahadeo Potdar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 22.10.2021 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Aatpa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Impleadment of Co-owners in Suit for Possession. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Allows Addition of Parties with Direct Interest in Subject Matter to Avoid Multiplicity of Suits.

The petitioners, Sitaram Deorao Pawar and Totaram Deorao Pawar, filed two separate writ petitions challenging an order dated 6/11/2003 passed by the J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Impleadment of Property Owner in Suit Challenging Demolition Notice Under MRTP Act. Owner is Necessary Party as Tenant's Challenge to Notice Directly Affects Owner's Rights Over Property.

The petitioners, tenants of the ground floor of a property, filed Regular Civil Suit No.418 of 2023 challenging a notice dated 10/03/2023 issued by th...