Search Results for "motor transport undertaking"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Registration Requirement for Off-Highway Construction Equipment Vehicles. Vehicles Designed Exclusively for Off-Highway Use in Mines Not Required to Be Registered Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Manikgarh Cement, a division of Century Textiles and Industries Limited, challenged a notice dated 18.10.2003 and order dated 24.11.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Exemption for Transport Vehicles in Motor Vehicles Rules — Rule 118(1)(iv) Exemption for M1 Category Vehicles Held Ultra Vires the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

The petitioner, a retired HAL employee, filed a public interest litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the not...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Registration of Off-Highway Mining Vehicles as Motor Vehicles. Vehicles Designed Exclusively for Off-Highway Use Not Required to Be Registered Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Manikgarh Cement, a division of Century Textiles and Industries Limited, challenged a notice dated 18.10.2003 and order dated 24.11.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals By Appellants. Against State Of Gujarat Ors. -- Holds Construction Equipment Not Motor Vehicles Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Exempts From Registration And Tax Under Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958

The Supreme Court examined whether various construction equipment used by cement manufacturers within their factory premises constitute 'motor vehicle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions of Motor Transport Workers Act. Provisions Permitting Extended Hours and Spread Over Upheld as Reasonable and Not Violative of Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved representative union for employees of Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Undertaking (BE...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions in Motor Transport Workers Act. Court upholds sections 13 and 16 of Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 as constitutionally valid and not violative of Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved and representative union for employees in the transport section of Brihanmumbai Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes RTA Order Rejecting Stage Carriage Permit Applications on Notified Routes — Remands for Fresh Consideration. RTA Must Independently Apply Mind and Not Merely Rely on Objections of State Transport Undertakings Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Sree Gajanana Motor Transport Company Limited, a stage carriage operator, applied for four stage carriage permits on routes including ...