Search Results for "moratorium under IBC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "moratorium under IBC"

113 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Despite Pending CIRP Under IBC — Section 14 IBC Does Not Bar Competent Authority from Exercising Jurisdiction Under Section 11(3) MOFA. The Court held that the statutory right of flat purchasers to obtain deemed conveyance under MOFA cannot be defeated by the pendency of insolvency proceedings against the promoter.

22 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Darshan Mandir Co-operative Housing Society Limited, is a cooperative housing society formed by purchasers of flats in a building cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Borrowers' Challenge Against DRT Orders Rejecting Interim Relief Despite Pending IBC Section 95 Petition. Interim Moratorium Under Section 96 IBC Bars Continuation of Securitisation Proceedings During Pendency of Insolvency Petition.

21 Apr 2026

The petitioners, M/s. Kapole Advertising Agency and others, were the original borrowers who had approached the Bombay High Court challenging two order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit Against Principal Borrower Despite Moratorium Against Guarantors Under IBC. The court permitted the plaintiff to proceed only against defendant no.1 (principal borrower) while reserving rights against guarantors under moratorium.

6 Apr 2026

The plaintiff, IL & FS Financial Services Limited, filed a commercial summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to recover ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Successful Resolution Applicant and Union Bank in DHFL Insolvency Case, Upholds Resolution Plan Modifications on Avoidance Applications and Confidentiality. The Court held that the NCLAT exceeded its jurisdiction by modifying the resolution plan approved by the CoC and NCLT regarding avoidance applications, and that the commercial wisdom of the CoC is not subject to judicial review except under Section 30(2) IBC.

1 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from the insolvency resolution of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL) under the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarified the Scope of Interim Moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Held That Regulatory Penalties Imposed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Are Not Covered

4 Mar 2025

Invoking Insolvency Proceedings Cannot stay execution of Penalty Orders for Consumer Protection Law Violations – The Apex Court Upheld the NCDRC’s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeal and Release of Deposited Amount in Insolvency Case — Moratorium Under Section 14 IBC Bars Enforcement Against Corporate Debtor's Assets. The cash deposit made by the corporate debtor in court is an asset belonging to the corporate debtor, and the resolution professional is entitled to its release for the resolution process.

13 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed an application filed by the Resolution Professional of Siti Networks Ltd. (corporate debtor) seeking withdrawal of Appea...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Despite Insolvency Proceedings. Criminal Liability Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Continues Simultaneously with Insolvency Resolution Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as Proceedings are Penal and Not Covered by Moratorium Under Section 14.

15 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a dishonoured cheque issued by M/s Rainbow Papers Limited, a company, to Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited, a public...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case: Limitation Period Not Extended by IBC Moratorium for Corporate Debtor's Own Application. Section 60(6) of IBC does not exclude limitation period for corporate debtor to file Section 11(6) application under Arbitration Act.

6 May 2022

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) against an order of the Delhi High Court appointing an arbitrator und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Liquidator's Appeal on Limitation Grounds in Insolvency Proceeding. Limitation period under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 runs from the date the order is made available, not from pronouncement, applying Section 420(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 50 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 for free copies.

22 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 13 July 2020, which dismissed the appellant's appeal as ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Resolution Professional to Continue CIRP Under IBC Despite Pending Winding-Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956. Leave under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 granted to proceed with Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

2 Nov 2018

The judgment concerns Company Application No. 10 of 2017 filed by the Resolution Professional of Murli Industries Limited (the corporate debtor) under...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)