Search Results for "mobile phone ownership"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Unproven Extra Judicial Confession. Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant challenging his conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC and destruction of evidence ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Double Murder of Wife and Child — Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Suspicion of Infidelity Lead to Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The judgment pertains to the confirmation of a death sentence and an appeal against conviction for the murder of a wife and her six-year-old son. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Ganpat Shingade. The appellants, including his wife Jyoti, were convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Love affair disapproval leads to abduction and murder; conviction under Sections 120B, 364, 302 IPC with life imprisonment confirmed.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by Pramod Shahu, Mukesh Shivhare, and Rajkumar Wankhede against their conviction by the Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Double Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Complete and Accused Failed to Explain Incriminating Facts Under Section 313 CrPC.

The appellant, Rajesab Mujawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji in Sessions Case No. 20/2008 for the murder of Shekappa Bhandar...