Search Results for "legible copies"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "legible copies"

46 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Right to Representation and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 Was Not Communicated, Rendering Detention Illegal.

8 Dec 2025

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Prathiba Talapati, wife of the detenu Sri. Dawood Nadaf, challenging the preventive detention order dated 03.06.20...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Bootlegging Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(2) of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 set aside as grounds did not show that ordinary law was insufficient to prevent the detenu from acting prejudicially.

12 Jul 2024

The petitioner, wife of Sharath @ Sharath Kumar, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detenti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Establish Detriment to Public Order.

29 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Nilesh Sunil Pendulkar, challenged an order dated 06.10.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar, under Section 3(1) of the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Detenu's History of Criminal Cases Does Not Justify Preventive Detention When Bail Was Granted in Most Cases and No Material Shows Inadequacy of Regular Law.

7 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Mohammad Shafiulla, father of the detenu Roshan Jameer @ Jameer @ Jammu, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Const...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MCOCA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by Detaining Authority. Failure to Consider Relevant Material and Mechanical Reproduction of Grounds Renders Preventive Detention Invalid.

7 Dec 2023

The petitioner, father of the detenu Ashish @ Sonu Manmurad Pande, filed a writ petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenue — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution of India and Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. The court held that the detaining authority must ensure the detenue understands the grounds of detention to make an effective representation; failure to do so renders the detention illegal.

31 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Shrenika, wife of the detenue Sri. Huchappa @ Dhanaraj Kalebag, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Ex-Parte Assessment Orders in MVAT and CST Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Assessment Orders Passed Without Considering Petitioner's Submissions and Without Granting Personal Hearing. The court held that the assessing officer must consider the assessee's response and grant a hearing before passing assessment orders, even if limitation is expiring.

30 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Greatship (India) Ltd., a company engaged in providing specialized services to oil and gas exploration and production entities, filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Violated by Failure to Furnish Statements of Co-Accused and Retraction Letters.

17 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Deepak Bapu Keluskar, challenged a detention order dated 29th September 2014 passed by the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to Illegible Documents Violating Article 22(5). Supplying illegible documents amounts to non-communication of grounds, depriving detenu of effective representation.

29 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Sanjay Soni, challenged a detention order dated 25th January 2012 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Acquittal in Criminal Cases Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority did not consider material fact of acquittal in two criminal cases, vitiating subjective satisfaction.

2 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Ashok Dadu Mangale, challenged a detention order dated 3/3/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai under Section 3(2)...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)