Search Results for "kerosene dealer"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows State's Revision, Restores Confiscation of Kerosene Under Essential Commodities Act. Appellate Court Cannot Substitute Its Own Satisfaction for That of Confiscating Authority Under Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows State's Revision and Restores Confiscation of Kerosene Under Essential Commodities Act. Appellate Court Cannot Substitute Its Own Satisfaction for That of Confiscating Authority Under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (correspond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Kerosene Dealers' Association Challenging Inclusion of VAT in Ceiling Price. State's Power to Fix Maximum Price Including Taxes Upheld Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The petitioners, Mumbai Kerosene Dealers' Association and its members, who are wholesale kerosene dealers holding licences under the Maharashtra Keros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sales Tax Reference by Dealer in Setoff Disallowance Case. Rule 41D of Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 restricts setoff to raw materials and consumable stores, not capital assets like scientific equipment used for research and development.

The case is a sales tax reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from an order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Cancelling Fair Price Shop License Without Hearing — Violation of Natural Justice Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955. License Cancellation Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Audi Alteram Partem Principle.

The petitioner, Dinesh Bansilal Agrawal, was a licensee of a fair price shop under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Minister of Food, Civil Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Competing Kerosene Dealer for Lack of Locus Standi. Mere Competitor Not a Person Aggrieved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The appellant, Rajendra Agrawal, a semi-wholesale kerosene dealer in Murtizapur, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of a Single Judge dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Essential Commodities Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Sale. Conviction under Section 3(2)(d) read with Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused sold kerosene above controlled price.

The appellant, Baban Shankar Walzade, was convicted by the Special Court under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for allegedly selling kerosene abov...