Search Results for "kanta blows"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jaikisan s/o Kashinath Dhamdhere, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule in Sessions Case No. 191 of 2014 for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. The court held that the trial court's finding of not guilty was based on a plausible appreciation of evidence and not perverse, thus no interference warranted.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondents (original accused) in Sessions Case No.160/1997 by the Sessions Judge, Yava...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as identification of accused was doubtful and recovery of weapon was not linked to the crime.

The appellant, Anil Shashikant Alve, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the murder of Santosh Karunakaran Malli under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 201, 324, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 6, were convicted by the Ist Ad hoc Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, on 8.5.2007 in Sessions Case No.102 of 2006...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) Delivers Judgment in State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Trespass Case under Sections 302, 447 read with 34 IPC

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of three respondents who were charged with the murder of Kanta, the younger brother of accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal, Upholds Conviction Under Section 326 IPC for Grievous Hurt Caused by Kanta Blows. Fracture Defined Broadly to Include Any Break, Splintering, or Fissure in Bone, Not Requiring Complete Cut or Displacement.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellants, Hori Lal and Bisram, under Section 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 452 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness failed to identify accused and medical evidence did not support prosecution version.

The appellant, Kailas Sopan Jade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 302, 307 and 452 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Motive. The Trial Court's finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt was not perverse, and the High Court declined to interfere under Section 378 CrPC.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 31.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Family Dispute Over Love Marriage. Allegations Involved Stabbing of Daughter and Son-in-Law by Family Members Under Sections 302, 307, 342 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code.

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, arose from the conviction of appellants—Amarjeetsingh (brother), Jagtars...