Search Results for "investor fraud"

62 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 62 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award directing payment of consideration for shares, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of contract, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Favor of Appellants in Commercial Suits Involving Secured Creditors. Appointment of receiver without notice and without considering secured creditors' rights under SARFAESI Act is unsustainable.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by Future Corporate Resources Pvt Ltd and Ojas Tradelease And Mall Management Pvt Ltd against or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Azim Premji for Lack of Authority to File on Behalf of Company. Managing Director's Authority to Sue Required Board Resolution as per Articles of Association.

The suit was filed by Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. (Plaintiff No.1) and its Managing Director R. Subramanian (Plaintiff No.2) against Azim Premji a...