Search Results for "infancy benefit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "infancy benefit"

16 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Interstate Child Trafficking Case Due to Perverse High Court Orders and Absconding Accused. Bail Granted Without Considering Gravity of Offences Under Sections 363, 311, 370(5) IPC and Organized Nature of Racket.

15 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court dealt with a series of appeals filed by victims' families seeking cancellation of bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to 13 acc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Hindu Succession Case, Reinstating Inheritance Rights of Grandsons. Release Deed Executed by Father During Grandfather's Lifetime Held Void as It Involved Non-Transferable Spes Successionis Under Section 6(a) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Does Not Bar Succession Under Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

25 Jan 2023

The dispute centered on succession to the separate property of Sengalani Chettiar, who died in 1988. He had two marriages: from the first, a son Chand...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Dispute — Upholds High Court's Finding of Non-Genuine Will Due to Suspicious Circumstances. The court affirmed that the propounder of a Will must dispel all suspicious circumstances, and the High Court's reversal of the Trial Court's decree was justified based on inconsistencies in evidence.

24 Apr 2020

The case involves a civil appeal by the plaintiffs-appellants against the High Court of Karnataka's judgment dated 26.10.2007, which reversed the Tria...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Three Establishments Denied Exemption Under Employees' Provident Funds Act. Functional Integrality and Common Ownership with Parent Company Preclude Claim of New Establishment Status Under Section 16(1)(d).

12 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed three civil appeals filed by M/s. Shree Vishal Printers Ltd., Jaipur (SVPL), M/s. Times Publishing House Ltd., Jaipur (TPH...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Medical Negligence Case Due to Lack of Monitoring in Dengue Treatment. Failure to Monitor Hematocrit and Platelet Levels Constitutes Negligence Despite Following Fluid Protocol.

9 Jan 2019

The case pertains to a medical negligence claim arising from the death of Madhu Manglik, the spouse of the appellant Arun Kumar Manglik, who was admit...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(b) of EPF Act — Hospital Established After Closure of Previous Unit Held Entitled to Infancy Exemption. The court held that the closure of the old hospital in 1989 and the subsequent establishment of a new hospital under a different trust with a new management structure constituted a new establishment under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

27 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Manipal Goa Cancer & General Hospital, challenged two orders: (a) an order dated 18/06/2007 by the Assistant Provident Fund Commission...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner in EPF Act Case — Company Entitled to Infancy Period. Functional integrality not established between two companies despite common ownership; Section 16(1)(d) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 applies to newly set up establishment.

7 Jul 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur, challenging the order of the Employees' Provident Fund A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Provident Fund Demand — Taj Residency Held Separate Establishment Entitled to Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(d) of EPF Act. The court held that the Taj Residency, Nasik was a newly established hotel with separate identity and not a branch of Hotel President, Mumbai, and thus entitled to infancy protection under Section 16(1)(d) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

11 Feb 2011

The petitioners, Piem Hotels Limited and another, challenged an order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) dated 31 March 1999, which he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Damages Under Section 14-B of EPF Act for Delayed Contributions. Levy of Damages Under Section 14-B Does Not Require Mens Rea and Is Compensatory in Nature.

28 Nov 2006

The petitioner, Poona Shims Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 30.6.1995 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under Section 14-B of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Challenge to Industrial Court Award on Wage Classification for Sugar Workers. Union's Claim for Proper Designation and Pay Scales from Commencement of Production Upheld as Reasonable.

19 Aug 2006

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging an award of the Industrial Court at Kolhapur in Reference (IC) No.17 of 1985 dated 12/12/1988. Th...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)