Search Results for "identity cards"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused in UAPA and BNS Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 13 of UAPA — Failure to Obtain Prior Approval from Central Government Renders Investigation Invalid

The case involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking quashing of FIR in Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Twin Brothers Seeking Biometric Update in Aadhaar Cards. Rejection of Biometric Update Request Without Assigning Reasons Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Rohit Bandu Nikalje and Rahul Bandu Nikalje, twin brothers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition of Married Daughter for Dependent Identity Card of Ex-Serviceman Father. Gender-Discriminatory Policy Denying Married Daughter Status While Granting to Married Son Struck Down as Unconstitutional Under Articles 14 and 15.

The petitioner, Priyanka R. Patil, is the second daughter of late Subedar Ramesh Khandappa Police Patil, who died in service due to a mine explosion d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Labour Union Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award. Reinstatement Without Back Wages Upheld for One Workman, Denied for Others Due to Lack of Evidence of Continuous Service Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Pune Labour Union, filed a writ petition challenging the award of the Industrial Tribunal, Pune, dated 21 August 1999, which partly al...