Search Results for "discretionary interest"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "discretionary interest"

2044 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2044 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Puisne Mortgagee's Right to Sue Separately When First Mortgagee Paid Off Before Sale. Court Reduces Interest from Contractual 12% to 6% Simple Under Order 34 Rule 11 CPC, Emphasizing Discretion to Grant Reasonable Rate.

6 Dec 1968

The dispute concerned a mortgagor's liability to a puisne mortgagee after the prior mortgage was satisfied without sale. The mortgagor had executed th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitrator's Discretion on Post-Award Interest. The Court held that under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitrator has discretion to determine the quantum for post-award interest, and since the award specified interest only on the principal, the statutory default did not apply.

1 Sep 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court dismissing an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Waiver of Interest Under Sections 234A, 234B, 234C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petitioner failed to deposit unutilized capital gains in specified account, leading to levy of interest.

25 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Humayun Suleman Merchant, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 5th October 2004 passed by the Chief Commissioner of Incom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission's Reduction of Interest Under Section 220(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Settlement Commission Has Power to Reduce Interest Under Section 220(2) When Settling Case Under Chapter XIX-A, and Such Reduction Does Not Require Prior Payment of Interest.

9 Dec 2021

The Union of India and the Commissioner of Income Tax filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 05/06/1998 and 04/08/1999 passed by the Incom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

10 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Commercial Appeal No. 38 of 2017: Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award under MSMED Act. Issues of Limitation, Mis-joinder of Causes of Action, and Territorial Jurisdiction Raised in Challenge to Award for Interest on Delayed Payments.

31 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s. Delton Electricals, a partnership firm and small scale industrial unit, filed Original Application No. 1 of 2005 before the Micro ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Delhi High Court’s Unconditional Stay of Money Decree Under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC. Execution of Trademark Infringement Money Decree Stayed Without Deposit Pending Appeal, Upheld by Apex Court Citing Sufficient Cause.

24 Sep 2025

The dispute arose from a civil suit instituted by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and anor, claiming to be the proprietor of the Beverly Hills Polo Club trade...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

7 Feb 2025

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

7 Jul 2022

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

Supreme Court

Public Interest Prevails Over Private Rights: : BIADA vs M/s Scope Sales Pvt Ltd (2026 INSC 89)

23 Jan 2026

The case arose when the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA) allotted land to M/s Scope Sales Pvt. Ltd. for commercial use. Subsequentl...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)