Search Results for "director guarantee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "director guarantee"

1108 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1108 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in FEMA Case — Nominee Director Not Vicariously Liable for Acts of Subordinates. The Court held that a nominee director of a joint venture company cannot be held vicariously liable under the Foreign Exchange Management Act for acts of commission or omission of subordinates without specific knowledge or involvement.

16 Sep 2010

The appellant, Shri M.M. Shah, was the paid Managing Director of Indian Card Clothing Ltd. (ICC) from 1994 to 1997. ICC and Spifa Germany promoted a j...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Against Hubtown Ltd. Based on Bona Fide Dispute of Debt. Corporate Guarantee Enforcement Requires Prima Facie Case of Default and Absence of Substantial Dispute Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Hubtown...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Under Sections 433 and 434 of Companies Act, 1956 — Guarantee Debt Disputed on Grounds of Foreign Law and Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Court holds that a winding-up petition based on a guarantee governed by Malaysian law cannot be adjudicated summarily without proof of debt under Indian law and proper service of demand notice.

27 Jan 2006

The case involves a winding-up petition filed by Malaysian International Trading Corporation Sdn Bhd and another (the petitioners) against Mega Safe D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Debenture Trustee in Recovery Suit Against Corporate Guarantor. Defendant's Triable Issues Found to be Sham and Moonshine, Entitling Plaintiff to Judgment Under Order 37 CPC.

8 May 2015

The plaintiff, IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Hubtow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Guarantee Dispute — Guarantor's Liability Not Discharged by Family Settlement Without Bank's Consent. Family Settlement Between Guarantor and Principal Debtor Does Not Discharge Guarantor Under Section 134 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

7 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Narinder Pal Agarwal, was a director and guarantor of Narendra Metal Converters Pvt. Ltd., which had taken loans from Saraswat Coopera...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM Petition to Enforce Guarantee Liability Under State Financial Corporations Act, 1951. Guarantors' Defense of Discharge Due to Variation in Contract Rejected as Guarantees Were Continuing and No Material Alteration Occurred.

14 Nov 2014

The petition was filed by SICOM Ltd., a State Financial Corporation, under Sections 31(1)(aa) and 32 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, se...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Encashment of Bank Guarantee in Winding Up Proceedings — Security Deposit Refund Ordered. Court held that failure to finalize leave and license agreement within extended period entitled applicant to refund of security deposit, and bank guarantee furnished pursuant to consent order could be encashed upon expiry.

2 Jan 2020

The applicant, Palladian Hotels Private Limited, filed a company application seeking an order to encash a bank guarantee of Rs.38,53,000/- furnished b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. The court held that under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, directors cannot be held liable without specific allegations that they were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of the company.

10 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Rakesh P. Gupta and Shishir Prabhakar Dharkar, were directors of a private limited company accused in two separate complaints under S...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, hears a company petition for winding up of Videocon Industries Limited under sections 433(e) and 434(1)(a) read with 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petition, filed by an Italian bank, alleges non-payment of Euros 38 million under a Patronage Letter, which the petitioner argues is a guarantee for a loan to a step-down subsidiary.

5 Dec 2013

The petition, Company Petition No. 528 of 2012, was filed by Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A., an Italian bank, seeking the winding up of Videocon Industries Li...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.

18 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)