Search Results for "contumacious intent"

38 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Violation of Status Quo Order in Arbitration Dispute. Status Quo Order Ambiguous and Not Willfully Disobeyed by Respondents in Sale of Flats Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment arises from a contempt petition filed by Amkhim Holdings Pvt. Ltd. and Vasant Kotak & Bros. Trading & Investments Pvt. Ltd. against respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Restrain Alienation of Property. Balance of convenience favored grant of ad-interim relief to protect subject matter of petition under Sections 397, 398 of Companies Act, 1956.

The present appeal arises from a Company Petition No. 149 of 2012 filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging oppression and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Judicial Officer for Alleged Disregard of Precedents. Court holds that mere erroneous orders or non-mention of cited judgments do not constitute contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Yogesh Waman Athavale, an advocate practicing in Chiplun, filed a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Dismissal of Suit for Non-Compliance with Discovery Orders. Order XI Rule 21 CPC Dismissal Set Aside as Trial Court Failed to Record Satisfaction of Willful Disobedience.

The petitioner, United Church of Northern India Trust Association, filed a suit for ejectment against the respondents who were in occupation of its pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...