Search Results for "confirmatory order"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over HAMON Mark. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAMON' found to be infringed by Defendant's use of 'HAMON COOLING' and 'HCS HAMON COOLING' in trade and corporate name.

The Plaintiff, John Cockerill Hamon SA, filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging infringement and passing off of its registered trademark 'HAMON' by the De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Alleging Illegal Demolition of Dwelling House and Seeking Compensation Under KMC Act, 1976. Allegations Include Backdating of Notices, Lack of Opportunity, and Collusion Between BBMP Officials and Private Respondent.

Background: The petitioner, a central government employee, purchased a residential property in Doddanekundi, Bengaluru, in 2005 from Dr. Suryakumar Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Confirmatory Order Under Section 321(3) of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Due to Lack of Notice. Notice under Section 308 of KMC Act Held Not a Substitute for Notice under Section 321(1), Necessitating Separate Provisional Order Before Confirmation.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order of the III Additional Distr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's Preventive Detention Set Aside as Authorities Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Confirmatory Order Was Passed Without Independent Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Ashokrao Uttamrao Pawar, father of the detenu Umesh @ Bunty s/o Ashok Pawar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the detention ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Karnataka Act for Twelve Months in First Instance. Detention Order Held Illegal as Contravening Proviso to Section 3(2) and Supreme Court Precedent in Cherukuri Mani; Detenu Ordered Released.

The petitioner, Yallappa, a poor coolie living with his wife and children in Raichur, was detained under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBEC Circular on Service Tax Refund for Exporters — Circular Held Ultra Vires Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 93 of Finance Act, 1994.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies including Larsen & Toubro Limited, Uhde India Private Limited, Tata Tel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Detention Order Beyond Three Months Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Interpretation of 'Such Detention' in Article 22(4)(a) of the Constitution Confirmed to Refer to Preventive Detention, Not Period of Detention.

The case involved a constitutional challenge to an order of preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, as amended. The appellant, ...