Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

1973 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1973 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preliminary Objection and Dismisses Appeal of Pre-emptors in Punjab Pre-emption Act Case. Retrospective Amendment of Section 31 by Punjab Act 10 of 1960 Bars Pre-emption Decree for Proprietors, Following Ram Swarup v. Munshi.

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose out of two consolidated suits for pre-emption filed after a sale of agricultural land in June 1957. The appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Concurrent Running of Sentences for Convicts in Multiple Criminal Cases Due to Hardship to Family. Court exercises discretion under Section 427 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to direct sentences to run concurrently instead of consecutively.

The petitioners, Navnit Madhukar Naik and his wife Priya Navnit Naik, were convicted in three criminal cases: Regular Criminal Case No. 105 of 2011 (o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Concurrent Running of Sentences for Petitioner Convicted in Multiple Theft Cases. Court exercises discretion under Section 427 CrPC to order sentences to run concurrently where offences are not grave and substantial sentence already undergone.

The petitioner, Syed Moula, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 read with Section 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking an orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Concurrency of Sentences in Multiple Convictions for Theft and Forgery. Court holds that Section 427(1) CrPC does not mandate concurrency for distinct transactions and that the trial court's discretion to order consecutive sentences was justified.

The petitioner, Abidkhan @ Salman Mukhtar Khan Pathan, was convicted in three separate criminal cases (C.C. Nos.664/PW/2011, 665/PW/2011, and 666/PW/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Concurrent Running of Subsequent Sentence with Life Imprisonment in Absence of Consecutive Direction. Default Rule Under Section 427(1) CrPC Mandates Concurrency When Subsequent Court Does Not Specify Consecutive Running.

The petitioner, Vasudeo Shankar Rajput @ Kanjarbhat, was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Injunction Suit — Petitioners Failed to Prove Title Over Suit Property. The Court upheld the rejection of interim injunction as the petitioners' title was already negated in earlier Second Appeal No. 111 of 1986.

The petitioners, Vishal Bhagwan Chandanshive and Ilahi Bandu Barudwale, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Proved by Attesting Witness and Part Performance, Defendant Failed to Discharge Burden Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant, Madan s/o Mohan Gupta, challenging the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Convicts' Petition for Concurrent Sentences in Multiple Robbery Cases. Court directs that sentences in seven cases run concurrently from the date of first conviction, applying Section 427(1) CrPC.

The petitioners, Akash Rashtrapal Deshpande and Nikunj @ Nikki Ramesh Sadhwani, were convicted in multiple robbery cases by Magistrate Courts in Bhand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract.

The appellant, Sri Bylamurthy, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the concurrent judgments ...