Search Results for "composite premises"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "composite premises"

334 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 334 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Acquisition of Alternative Residence by Tenant Not Ground for Eviction When Premises Let for Composite Purpose of Residence and Profession Under Section 14(1)(h).

14 Mar 1969

The dispute originated from a tenancy entered into by an advocate, the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents, who took on rent certain premises f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Trade Union in Provident Fund Coverage Dispute — Factory Held Not a Branch of Trading Firm Under Section 2A of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Common ownership and consolidation of accounts insufficient to treat two separate establishments as one integral unit for PF coverage.

3 Feb 2010

The appellant, Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh, a trade union, filed a writ appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing its...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Revision in Licensee Eviction Case Under Section 13A(2) of Bombay Rent Act — License Agreement Prior to Amendment Not Barred. The Court held that Section 13A(2) applies to agreements executed before its commencement if the license period expires after the provision came into force, and remanded for consideration of composite purpose.

27 Jun 2005

The petitioner, Brigedier Shankarrao Damaji Parab, is the landlord of a residential flat in Pune. He had given the premises to the respondent, Dr. Nar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears challenge to constitutional validity of explanation inserted into Sections 65(105)(zzq) and 65(105)(zzzh) and clause (zzzzu) of the Finance Act 1994 by the Finance Act 2010. The impugned provisions deem construction services provided by a builder to a buyer in case of a new building intended for sale as a taxable service and bring preferential location charges within the service tax net.

19 Jan 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions introduced by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Eurobond Industries v. Euro Panel Products. Passing off and trademark infringement established due to deceptive similarity between 'Eurobond' and 'Euro' marks.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Eurobond Industries Private Limited (the appellant/defendant) against Euro Panel Products Pvt. Limited ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition in Rent Control Case — Composite Tenancy Not Severable Without Consent. Landlord's suit for possession of backside room fails as composite tenancy for residence and business cannot be split under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

13 Jul 2005

The petitioner-landlord, Sou. Jayawantibai Popatlal Lunkad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgm...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Composite Lease Plea Rejected. Landlord's Bona Fide Requirement for Own Use and Occupation Upheld Under Section 10(3)(b) of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960.

27 Feb 2026

The revision petition was filed by the tenant, G.Mohan @ Mohanendran, against the concurrent orders of eviction passed by the Rent Controller and the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tenants' Right to Park in Building Compound as Part of Leasehold Rights — Injunction Granted Against Landlord's Interference. Parking rights held to be incidental to tenancy where rent includes parking charges and tenants have used open space from inception.

2 Sep 2011

The appeal arises from a suit filed by Respondent Nos.1 to 10 (original Plaintiffs) seeking a permanent injunction against the Appellant, United India...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)