Search Results for "combined seniority"

94 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CAT Order Quashing Seniority List. Seniority of Direct Recruit Inspectors Cannot Be Antedated Over Promotees Without Following DoPT OM and Recruitment Rules.

The case involves a challenge to the seniority list dated 07.12.2021 and paragraph 7(iii) of DoPT OM dated 13.08.2021 by promotee Inspectors (Examiner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Promotee Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Direct Recruits in Income Tax Department — Direct Recruits Not Entitled to Seniority from Vacancy Year When Recruitment Process Not Initiated in That Year.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by promotees (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had quashed the seniority li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The High Court of Karnataka Division Bench heard writ appeals against the order of the learned Single Judge in a service matter involving judicial officers. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 27-09-2013 in WP Nos. 41684-691/2012.

These writ appeals, filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, arise from a common order dated 27-09-2013 passed by a learned Single...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Arising from Cadre Bifurcation and Re-amalgamation in Customs and Excise Department. Dispute Centers on Impact of Separate Data Processing Cadre on Ministerial Employee Seniority Under the 1979 Recruitment Rules.

The case involved a seniority dispute among employees of the Customs and Central Excise Department. The original ministerial cadre, governed by the Ce...