Search Results for "collecting bank"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "collecting bank"

392 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Under SARFAESI Act Between Secured Creditor and Prospective Secured Creditor Over Title Documents Dispute. The court held that a dispute between a secured creditor and an entity prevented from becoming a secured creditor due to refusal to hand over title documents is arbitrable under Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

6 May 2026

The case involves a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited (Applicant)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decrees Suit in Favour of Financial Advisor in Commercial Summary Suit for Professional Fees — Interpretation of Mandate Letter Options for Success Fee on Cash Sales of NPAs. Court holds that where the Bank exercised option of 100% cash sales, the Financial Advisor is entitled to success fee at the higher rate of 0.50% on cash received, as per option (a) of the Mandate Letter dated 1 July 2017.

25 Feb 2025

The Plaintiff, Special Situation Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in providing financial adviso...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Videocon Industries Against Winding Up Order for Non-Payment of Guarantee Debt to Italian Bank. Patronage Letter Held to Be a Guarantee Under Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Claim Not Time-Barred.

19 Jul 2014

The case involves an appeal by Videocon Industries Limited against an order of the Company Judge directing payment of Rs.259.73 crores to Intesa Sanpa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows SBI Appeal in Demand Draft Fraud Case — Bank Held Negligent for Confirming Non-Encashment Despite Prior Payment. SBI Bangalore's Own Negligence in Issuing Incorrect Confirmation Precludes Recovery from Collecting Bank Under Section 131 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

14 Aug 2013

The appellant, State Bank of India (SBI), Bangalore branch, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

30 Jul 2013

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in CBI Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

24 Jun 2013

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by accused persons convicted by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore, in Spl.C.C.No.139 of 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Section 138 NI Act Jurisdiction Dispute — Complaint Maintainable at Place of Payee's Bank. Territorial jurisdiction for dishonour of cheque lies where the payee's bank is located, as presentation and dishonour occur there under Section 178(d) CrPC.

29 Aug 2011

The case involves a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, concerning territorial jurisdiction. The appellant, Cro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the cause of action under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 arises only at the place where the cheque is presented and dishonoured, not at the place of issuance or the complainant's registered office.

3 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. Preetha S. Babu, a resident of Ernakulam, Kerala, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit by Bank Against Company for Dishonour of Bill of Exchange — Bank Entitled to Claim Amount with Interest as Holder in Due Course. The plaintiff bank negotiated and discounted a bill of exchange drawn by the defendant company; upon dishonour, the bank as holder in due course was entitled to recover the bill amount with interest.

17 Mar 2006

The plaintiff, Bhumiputra Commerce Bank (originally Patel Holdings Sendirian Berhad, Penang), filed a suit for recovery of Rs.29,62,400/- with interes...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the complainant must prove that the demand notice was sent to the correct address of the accused by registered post with acknowledgment due, failing which the complaint is not maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves a batch of criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Prabhakar Dattatraya Gune, Sanjay Chandrakant Kirloskar, and M.V. P...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)