Search Results for "clarificatory amendment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "clarificatory amendment"

168 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows University Appeal in Increment Dispute Under UGC Scheme. Two Advance Increments Denied to Lecturer Holding Ph.D. on Placement as Selection Grade Lecturer Upheld.

10 May 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which directed the Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit to grant two advance i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Internal Reservation for Backward Classes in Tamil Nadu - The Court reversed the High Court's declaration of unconstitutionality, holding that sub-classification within Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities is permissible under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution of India, 1950, based on commission recommendations and historical data.

31 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from the Tamil Nadu Special Reservation of seats in Educational Institutions including Private Educational Institutions and of appoi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

6 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Incentive Withdrawal Case — Policy Change Upheld as Prospective and in Public Interest. The Court held that the impugned notification was not retrospective and promissory estoppel did not bar the government from modifying the incentive scheme for Kutch industries.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India against the common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had quashed Notificatio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Principal Qualification Dispute — Ph.D Not Mandatory Under AICTE Regulations. Court Holds That 2010 AICTE Regulations Provide Alternate Qualifications for Principal Post, and State Rules Providing for Appointment Without Ph.D Are Not Ultra Vires.

18 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the High Court of Chhattisgarh's order quashing promotions of seven appellants to the post of Principal i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgments on Creamy Layer Determination for OBC Reservation in Civil Services. Inclusion of Salary Income for PSU Employees Under Category II(C) of Office Memorandum Dated 08.09.1993 Found Discriminatory and Set Aside Due to Violation of Article 14.

11 Mar 2026

The Supreme Court dealt with three consolidated civil appeals arising from separate High Court judgments concerning the determination of creamy layer ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order Allowing Amendment of Appeal Memorandum. Amendment Sought to Clarify Resignation Documents as Notice and Resignation Letter Was Held Permissible Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Despite Being Filed After Conclusion of Final Arguments, as It Was Clarificatory and Not Prejudicial.

6 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from an appeal filed by a teacher challenging his resignation and seeking reinstatement under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Clarificatory Notification Must Be Considered by State Authorities. The Court held that the State cannot deny exemption based on date of import when a clarificatory notification extends the benefit, and the State must act fairly and be aware of its own notifications.

23 Jan 2020

The appellant, M/s. Granules India Ltd., imported 96 tons of Acetic Anhydride under three Bills of Entry in December 1993 through the Inland Water Con...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)