Search Results for "builders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "builders"

1464 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1464 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

5 May 2026

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit — Amendment Allowed as Necessary for Determining Real Controversy Between Parties. The court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment to incorporate death of original plaintiff and substitution of legal representatives, holding that pre-trial amendments are to be liberally allowed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

5 Dec 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Wrangle Investment Limited, challenged the judgment and order dated 26 September 2019 passed by the Court of Small Causes at Bomb...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Plea to Quash Impleadment of Company in SFIO Prosecution. Application Under Section 319 CrPC Allowed by Magistrate Challenged by Former Managing Director.

28 Jul 2023

The petitioner, former Managing Director of Megacity (Bangalore) Developers and Builders Limited, filed criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Concessionaire in Airport Metro Express Line Dispute. The court held that the Delhi High Court's interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was unjustified, as the Arbitral Tribunal's findings on defects and material breach in the concession agreement were based on evidence and within its jurisdiction.

9 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals arising from a dispute between Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (DAMEPL), the appellant and co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

28 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Objection to Attachment Under MPID Act — Property Belonging to Appellants Not Proceeds of Crime. The court held that the appellants, as bona fide purchasers, are entitled to release of attachment under Section 7(3) of the MPID Act as the property was purchased prior to the alleged deposit scheme.

6 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 (MPID Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consent Decree Execution Dispute — Family Settlement Must Be Enforced to Give Fruits of Decree. Court Holds That Executing Court Cannot Nullify Consent Terms by Reading Implied Conditions; Direction Issued to Execute Letter of Allotment.

31 Jan 2020

The dispute arose between two groups of family members, the PA Group (appellants) and the RA Group (respondents), over the assets of Kash Foods Privat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Award declared firm dissolved on a date not claimed by any party and failed to consider crucial evidence regarding partnership property.

5 Jun 2017

The Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges an arbitral award dated 1st August 2006. The petiti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. The court held that the suit for partition was maintainable and that the plaintiffs had established their share in the joint family property.

30 Sep 2015

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants) seeking partition and separate possession...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)