Search Results for "arbitrary discretionary power"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "arbitrary discretionary power"

759 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petition Challenging Rescission of Appointment of Additional District Government Pleader Within 24 Hours. The Court Examines Whether the Impugned Notification Violates Constitutional Prohibition Against Arbitrariness in Context of Pleasure Doctrine.

25 Nov 2025

The case concerns the abrupt withdrawal of an appointment as Additional District Government Pleader at the newly established XI Additional District an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Lease for Delay in Hotel Construction Due to Economic Slowdown and Infrastructure Delays. Extension of Time Granted Without Additional Premium Under Agreement to Lease.

13 Mar 2025

The petitioners, M/s. PVP Star Hotels Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Bid in Tender Process for Distribution Franchisee — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary Action by State Entity. The court quashed the disqualification of the petitioner's bid due to non-submission of power of attorney in prescribed format, holding that the respondent failed to provide prior notice or opportunity to explain.

28 Jul 2010

The petitioner, A2Z Maintenance & Engineering Services Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the disqualification of its bid by the Maharashtra S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.

22 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Inordinate Delay in Granting Permission to Change Land Use from Railway Reservation to Amenities Under DC Regulations. Held that the Corporation's failure to decide the application within a reasonable time amounts to arbitrary exercise of power and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

13 Mar 2014

The petitioners, Wadhwa Residency Private Limited and Mr. Manohar M. Chhabria, owned a large plot of land in Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was designated as...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal, Holds CESTAT Has Power to Condon Delay Under Section 129A(5) of Customs Act, 1962. The Court Remanded the Matter for Consideration of Condonation of Delay on Merits, Ruling That Appeals Under Section 129D(3) Are Deemed Appeals Under Section 129A and Thus Subject to the Same Condonation Power.

13 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) against an order of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBDT Action Plan Points System for Tax Recovery as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. The court struck down the system of awarding points to Income Tax Officers for achieving tax recovery targets, holding it ultra vires the Income Tax Act, 1961 and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

11 Apr 2019

The Bombay High Court, in a judgment dated 11th April 2019, dealt with two petitions challenging a portion of the Central Action Plan for the financia...

High Court

High Court Quashes Selection Process in Public Employment Case Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. Recruitment for Junior Officer Posts Set Aside as Weightage Application After Tests Violated Advertisement Terms and Candidates' Rights Under Article 14.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a recruitment process conducted by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd. for Junior Officer (Security) positions thro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.

3 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)