Search Results for "aiding"

332 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 332 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Direct Instigation. Allegation of Cruelty and Dowry Demand Fails as Prosecution Could Not Prove Mens Rea or Active Abetment Under Section 306 IPC.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Thameem Ansari against his conviction under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide of his wife, Syed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Mother in POCSO Abetment Case — No Evidence of Intentional Aiding. Section 17 POCSO Act requires mens rea and overt act; mere presence or failure to protect insufficient for conviction.

The appellant, Asha Patil, was convicted under Section 17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) for abetting the se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case — Abetment of Bribe Not Proven. Pan Shop Owner's Conviction Under Section 12 Set Aside as Evidence Lacked Specific Demand and Proof of Mens Rea.

The appellant, Abdul Mannan Mohd. Yusuf, was convicted under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by the Special Court, Nagpur, in Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Debt or Liability. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails as complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt.

The applicants, Ravindra s/o Bhimrao Khillare, Seema w/o Ravindra Khillare, Deepak s/o Bhimrao Khillare, and Kalpana w/o Deepak Khillare, filed a crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Appellants in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation or Abetment. Conviction under Section 306 IPC read with Section 114 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove any positive act of instigation or intentional aid by the accused.

The appellants, Doddathayamma and Shamshad Begum, were convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysore, in S.C.No.316/2007 for the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Order Upheld. Penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 set aside for lack of evidence of aiding and abetting.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...