Search Results for "Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act"

157 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 157 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act Case — Continuing Unlawful Activity Requires Post-Promulgation Offence. The Court held that the prosecution must prove that the accused committed an organised crime after the Act came into force, and mere prior charge-sheets are insufficient to invoke the Act.

15 Dec 2022

The State of Gujarat appealed against the High Court's order granting bail to the respondent-accused, Sandip Omprakash Gupta, who was charged under Se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FCRA Amendments in Challenge by NGOs — Restrictions on Foreign Contribution Transfers and Mandatory Account in SBI New Delhi Held Reasonable. Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sections 7, 12(1A), 12A, and 17(1) of Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020 as Not Violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21.

8 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns the constitutional validity of amendments to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) introduced by the Foreign Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.

1 Jan 2021

The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Former Chief Minister in Corruption Case Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Pre-Condition. Investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was invalid as prior approval under Section 17A was not obtained, rendering the FIR and remand order liable to be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

16 Jan 2024

The dispute involved a former Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh challenging criminal proceedings initiated against him by the State CID for alleged off...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Council of Architecture's Appeal, Upholds That Section 37 of Architects Act Only Prohibits Use of Title 'Architect'. Government Posts Titled 'Architect' Can Be Held by Unregistered Individuals as the Act Does Not Prohibit Practice of Architecture.

17 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment that Section 37 of the Architects Act, 1972 only prohibits unregister...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in MCOC Act Case Due to Lack of Sufficient Material and Non-Application of Mind in Granting Approval and Sanction. Appellants Discharged Under Section 227 CrPC as Material on Record Did Not Warrant Framing of Charge Under MCOC Act.

16 Jul 2014

The present appeals were filed by Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal and Umesh Mohan Kirve, who were accused Nos. 3 and 9 respectively in a case registered under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

High Court

Court Upholds Stringent Provisions of MCOC Act, Denies Anticipatory Bail. Emphasizes Legislative Intent to Combat Organized Crime, Dismisses Reliance on SCST Act Precedents and Non-Binding Judgments

28 Jun 2024

The judgment examines the applicability of anticipatory bail provisions under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOC Act) in comparison ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail to Accused in Terror Funding Case Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — High Court Order Set Aside for Erroneous Application of Section 43D(5) Bar. The Court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) applies when the court finds a prima facie case, and the High Court's approach was contrary to law.

1 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against the Delhi High Court's order granting bail to Zahoor Ahm...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)