Search Results for "Time Bound Promotion Scheme"

527 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 527 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professors' Writ Petition for Time-Bound Promotion. Court holds that the benefit of time-bound promotion under Government Resolution dated 15-04-1999 is available from the date of initial appointment, and denial by management is arbitrary.

The petitioners, ten Assistant Professors employed at Yeshwantrao Chavan Mahavidyalaya, Tuljapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Time Bound Promotion of Bailiff in Subordinate Court. Petitioner denied assured promotional scale despite completing 12 years of service as per Government Resolution.

The petitioner, Shrirang Atmaram Nikam, was appointed as a Bailiff in the subordinate court on 17th April 1989 and was confirmed subsequently. He clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Second Time Bound Promotional Pay Scale to Retired Employees. Held that the period of 12 years for the second time bound promotion must be computed from the date of grant of the first time bound promotion, not from the initial appointment date.

The petitioners, five retired employees of the Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition challenging the orders dated 03/08/2020 and 04/04/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Drivers' Petition for Time Bound Promotion Scheme Benefits. Government Resolution dated 17.5.2003 Quashed as Discriminatory Against Drivers in Zilla Parishads.

The petitioners, four drivers employed by Zilla Parishads in Gadchiroli, Amravati, and Chandrapur, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of Governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Senior Teacher Challenging Tribunal Order Setting Aside Promotion as Head Master. Initial Unwillingness for Promotion Does Not Bar Subsequent Willingness When No Appointment Made, Under MEPS Rules.

The petitioner, Bhimrao Keshao Telang, was promoted to the post of Head Master of a school by an order dated 23 April 1997. Respondent No.1, Prabhudas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promotion with Deemed Date in Service Law Case Due to Delayed Communication of Adverse CR and Subsequent Upgradation. Petitioner entitled to promotion from 15.05.2012 despite initial adverse grading which was later upgraded to 'Very Good'.

The petitioner, an employee of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., joined service on 29.06.1999 as Assistant Engineer. For the year 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Recovery of Excess Payment Under Time Bound Promotion Scheme. Recovery of Rs.2,58,711/- Set Aside as No Misrepresentation by Employee and Recovery Ordered Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Ajabrao Rambhau Patil, was appointed as Technical Assistant on 16.02.1982 in the office of respondent no.3. The post was later abolish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion to Branch Manager in Shabari Tribal Financial Development Corporation Ltd. — Held that Petitioner's Candidature for Promotion to Class-I Post Must Be Considered as Per Recruitment Rules.

The petitioner, Shridhar Sambhaji Dhale, possessed a Master's degree in Commerce and joined as Junior Assistant in 1979 with the Maharashtra State Co-...