Search Results for "Shadow Panch"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Shadow Panch"

234 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony was not corroborated and recovery of tainted money was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

22 Jan 2024

The appellant, Ramesh Tukaram Waghmare, was a District Social Welfare Officer at Zilla Parishad, Wardha, and was the sanctioning authority for grant-i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

12 Jul 2019

The appellant, Mahesh Ramesh Jadhav, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Contends Non-Proof of Bribe Demand and Admission of Loan Repayment by Complainant.

2 Nov 2018

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 29.03.2005 in Special Case No.26/2003 passed by the Special Judge at Aurangabad, convicting the app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

14 Aug 2018

The appellant, Deorao Marotrao Bhagatkar, was the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in S...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal from Conviction of Assistant Police Inspector and Police Naik Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Allegations Involved Multiple Demands of Bribe to Favour Accused in Matrimonial FIR Under Sections 7, 12, and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the P.C. Act, 1988.

15 Jun 2018

The appeal arises from the conviction of two police officers, an Assistant Police Inspector and a Police Naik, under the Prevention of Corruption Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Teacher in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Alleged Bribe Demand for Passing Students Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Demand Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

11 Jun 2018

The appellant, Namdeo Bakaramji Pagare, a teacher at a government school in Wardha, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corrupt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

29 Aug 2017

The appellant, Dattatraya Rajaram Thaokar, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 25/1991 for of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 161 IPC set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

16 Aug 2017

The appellant, Shridhar Ramkrushna Fale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Tax Collector in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. Demand of Illegal Gratification for Issuing Tax Demand Notice Proved Through Trap and Recovery of Tainted Currency Notes.

14 Aug 2017

The appellant, Dayaram s/o Balram Kuthe, was a Tax Collector with the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. The complainant, Dharamraj Natthuji Madankar, cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

26 Apr 2012

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)