Search Results for "Section 452 IPC"

252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Vinod Shashikant Ingle and Pooja Vinod Ingle, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Akola, for the murder of Arun Ingle under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 452, 376AB, 506 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anand S/o Durgappa Gollar, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Belagavi in Special Case No.505/2023 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC in Black Magic Motive Case — Common Intention Established Through Eyewitness Testimony and Recovery of Weapon.

The case involves an appeal by four accused persons against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Seven Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC set aside as evidence failed to establish membership of unlawful assembly or common object to commit murder.

The case involves seven appeals filed by Ganpat Bapu Salunkhe, Shahaji Vasant Patil, Vinodsingh Shamsingh Rawat, Chandrakant Dhodiba Tikone, Appa Suba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide and House Trespass in Fatal Assault Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 304-II and 452 IPC for causing death by kicking a heart patient after entering his house without permission.

The appellant, Amar Singh Rathod, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Sections 304-II and 452 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376(2), 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dasu s/o Kisan Waghmare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Majalgaon, in Special Case No. 14 of 2014 for offences under Sections 452,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in House Trespass Case Due to Unreliable Sole Witness. Conviction under Section 452 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and the prosecution failed to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dinesh Chandrikaprasad Phatak, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar under Section 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...