Search Results for "Section 133 Evidence Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Section 133 Evidence Act"

958 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 958 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Closure Orders Against Stone Crushing Plants Under Section 133 CrPC for Lack of Preliminary Order and Imminent Danger Finding. The court held that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate must first pass a conditional order and record a finding of present injury before directing closure under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

12 Aug 2024

The petitioners operated stone crushing plants in Uran, Raigad, with valid consents from MPCB and mining licenses. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Panv...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment; Trial Court Partly Decreed Suit for Permanent Injunction and Dismissed Suit for Declaration and Possession. Title Dispute Arises from Conflicting Chain of Transfers Involving Original Owner Muniyappa, GPA Holder, and Subsequent Buyers.

16 Oct 2019

These two Regular First Appeals arose from a common judgment of the VIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, dated 21-06-2014. The di...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Section 133 CrPC Proceedings Initiated Based on Panchayat Complaint — Dispute Over Fencing on Private Property Not a Public Nuisance Under Section 133 CrPC. The court held that proceedings under Section 133 CrPC cannot be initiated for a private property dispute where there is a civil dispute over title and possession, and the Magistrate must apply judicial mind before acting on a police report.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Alexio Travasso, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Design Infringement and Passing Off Case — Registered Design Owner Granted Protection Against Infringement. Court Confirms That Substantial Similarity to Registered Design Constitutes Infringement Under Section 22 of Designs Act, 2000, and That Interim Relief Is Properly Granted When Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Are Established.

20 Feb 2018

The present appeal was filed by the original defendants (Kalpesh R. Jain, Ravi Raut, and Ketan Panchal) against the order and judgment dated 06.12.201...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

17 Dec 2014

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

High Court

KAHC010422252008_1

17 Dec 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

17 Dec 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit properties, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

29 Apr 2014

The appellant, Basavaraj Basavanneppa Pattan, filed six second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

8 Apr 2014

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.

1 Jan 1970

...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)