Search Results for "Section 111(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Section 111(2)"

52 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 Due to Compliance with Natural Justice and Sufficient Evidentiary Basis. Closure Under Section 18(1) Does Not Require Prior Conviction, Distinguishing It from Section 18(2), Based on Police Report and Service of Notices.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from an order dated 21.07.2025 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shirdi, evicting the petitioners from their premises and dir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

17 Dec 2024

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Revision Proceedings — Held That MRT Erred in Rejecting Revision as Not Maintainable Without Considering Merits. The court directed the MRT to consider the revision applications afresh on merits, including the question of maintainability, under Section 76 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

31 Jan 2023

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions challenging identical orders dated 17.03.2021 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Successful Resolution Applicant and Resolution Professional in IBC Case — Commercial Wisdom of CoC Upheld. NCLAT Order Set Aside as It Improperly Interfered with CoC's Decision to Accept H1 Bidder's Plan Despite Belated Revised Offer.

17 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Ngaitlang Dhar (successful resolution applicant) and Amit Pareek (Resolution Professional) against the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial IP Suit — Delay of 410 Days Not Sufficiently Explained. Policy Changes and Preoccupation of Legal Team Held Not to Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC.

26 May 2020

The case involves a commercial IP suit filed by Metro Shoes Ltd (Plaintiff) against Flipkart India Pvt. Ltd. and Tech-Connect Retail Pvt. Ltd. (Defend...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Holds Magistrate Can Order Further Investigation Post-Cognizance Under Section 173(8) CrPC. The Court clarified that the power to order further investigation is not extinguished by filing of charge-sheet or taking of cognizance, and can be exercised before commencement of trial.

16 Oct 2019

The case arises from an FIR lodged on 22.12.2009 by Nitinbhai Mangubhai Patel, Power-of-Attorney holder of Ramanbhai Bhagubhai Patel and Shankarbhai B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Confirms Conviction but Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder of Minor Girl. Circumstantial evidence including last seen together and failure to explain incriminating circumstances upheld conviction, but mitigating factors led to commutation of death penalty.

5 Feb 2019

The appellant, Vijay Raikwar, was convicted by the Trial Court for the rape and murder of a 7½-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(f) and Section 201 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Tenant Seeking Alternate Accommodation After Demolition for Road Widening — No Statutory Right to Alternate Site Under Municipal Law.

22 Aug 2005

The appellant, M/s Quality Printing Press, was a tenant running a printing and packaging business in a structure at Sunrise Estate, Kurla West, Mumbai...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)