Search Results for "Sarpanch disqualification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Sarpanch disqualification"

101 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 101 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Restores Removal of Up-Sarpanch and Panchayat Member for Illegal Attempt to Transfer Sarpanch's Statutory Powers | Section 39 Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act

25 Feb 2026

The petitioner, elected Sarpanch of Hiware Village Panchayat, sought removal of Respondent Nos. 5 (Up-Sarpanch) and 6 (Member) under Section 39(1) of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch in Corruption Case — No Material to Show Acceptance of Bribe by Petitioner. Disqualification under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 set aside as mere registration of FIR against petitioner and her husband under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 does not prove personal involvement in bribe acceptance.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Priti Manoj Bundile, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat Mahuli Jahangir, Amravati on 15.01.2021 and subsequently elected as Sar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch in Corruption Case — No Material to Show Acceptance of Bribe by Petitioner. Disqualification under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 set aside as mere registration of FIR under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 without evidence of personal involvement does not warrant removal.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Priti Manoj Bundile, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat Mahuli Jahangir, Amravati on 15.01.2021 and subsequently elected as Sar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reduces Disqualification Period for Delayed Submission of Election Expenses Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Proportionality of Penalty Considered

28 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court considered appeals against disqualification of elected members of Gram Panchayats under Section 14B of the Maharashtra Village Panch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — No Evidence of Wilful Omission Causing Loss to Gram Panchayat. Disqualification set aside as Collector failed to record finding of loss and appellate authority dismissed appeal without considering merits.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Savita Devidas Adhane, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Viramgaon. On 04.08.2018, the District Collector, Aurangabad, disqualifi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Failure to Convene Monthly Meetings — Responsibility Lies with Village Development Officer Under Meeting Rules, Not Sarpanch Under Section 36 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act

12 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Salimbi Mubarak Tamboli, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Savargaon (Dere) in 2015, unopposed as the only OBC candidate. The U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election in Gram Panchayat Dispute — No Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 for Failure to Pay Tax When No Tax Was Imposed.

1 Feb 2019

The case involves a dispute regarding the election of the Up-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Sukli, District Akola. The petitioners, who are members of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2014

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Fourth Child Born After Cut-off Date Despite Child's Death. The birth of a live child after the cut-off date constitutes an increase in the number of children under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, and the subsequent death of the child does not attract the protection of the first proviso.

13 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Patiram @ Ratiraj Shirbhiye, was elected as Member and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wadala on 28-8-2005. Respondent No.3, Go...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Orders Setting Aside Election of Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch. The court held that being a defaulter of a cooperative society does not disqualify a member from being elected as Sarpanch or Upa-Sarpanch under Section 14 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

1 Feb 2006

The petitioners, Jabin Akhtar Shirgonkar and another, were elected as Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch respectively of the Grampanchayat, Karla, Taluka & Dis...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)